Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 12,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2025, 1:12 pm
PLO (consolidated with United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 7:39 am
The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, now listed as U.S. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 5:54 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 4:31 am
” A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: Ellingburg v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 12:04 pm
On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued the “Unleashing American Energy” Executive Order (“EO”) with the stated purpose of ensuring an abundant supply of affordable and reliable energy in the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 12:15 pm
Funez-Ortiz v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 7:47 am
The United States Supreme Court clarified this month in Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 7:47 am
The United States Supreme Court clarified this month in Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 7:47 am
The United States Supreme Court clarified this month in Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 2:00 am
The United States Supreme Court subsequently granted the SEC’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
Top Cop Shop, Inc., supra (“The December 5, 2024 amended order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, case No. 4:24–cv–478, is stayed”). [6] Smith v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 2:55 pm
See United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 12:43 pm
On Monday afternoon, the Court granted IJ's petition for certiorari in Martin v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 11:16 am
Lynk Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 6:52 am
Oshman v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 6:12 am
United States, should not suffice. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Victoria Sutton, We Can Protect The “Waters of The United States” As Long As They Stay Out of The Hydrological Cycle, 61 Idaho L. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 1:48 am
” United StatesTikTok Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 5:14 pm
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacated the Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) 1:1 consent rule. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 7:02 am
Macy’s relied in part on United States v. [read post]