Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 13,617
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2024, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) [Germany][Petition granted] [Habitual residence]   In Baz v Patterson, 2024 WL 1879035 (Seventh Circuit, 2024) Asli Baz, a citizen of Germany, filed suit seeking to compel Anthony Patterson, a citizen of the United States, to return their six-year-old son, A.P., from Illinois to Germany. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 11:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
Both of these initiatives proved fruitless, and da Costa then turned his attention to the American courts: he filed a petition under the Convention in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
The issue is particularly relevant in light of the recent decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 2:20 pm by John Stigi and Melissa Mikail
June 27, 2024), the United Stated Supreme Court (Roberts, C.J.) held that when the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment of the United States Constitution entitles the defendant to a trial by jury. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
              In a prior post, I have analyzed the justices’ treatment of the questions presented in the petition in Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
The United States Supreme Court has held that that, in light of the Seventh Amendment’s right to a jury trial, the SEC must pursue enforcement actions seeking civil penalties in a jury trial proceeding in federal court rather than in an action before an administrative law judge. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:25 pm by Stephen Halbrook
A good faith disagreement exists between the majority in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:52 am by Josh Blackman
United States turns on the line between a bribe and a gratuity. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
When a DACA recipient who has been unlawfully present in the United States for a lengthy period of time leaves the United States to apply for an employment-based visa at a U.S. consulate abroad, they are likely to trigger the 3- or 10-year bars pursuant to INA § 212(a)(9)(B).Under INA § 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) a person who is unlawfully present for more than 180 days but less than 1 year, and who voluntarily departs the US prior to the commencement of… [read post]