Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 12,086
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 7:25 am
Simon (Joyce) v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
On this score, Bradley’s critique of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 4:30 am
And in her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 4:33 pm
" (Although the text of Section 14 is directed to petitions to cancel registrations, the Board held in PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
One of his most striking examples is that executive agreements have since displaced treaties as the primary process through which the United States enters into international agreements. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 12:31 pm
17 Jan 2025, 8:17 am
United States, 250 U. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 7:48 am
A unanimous Supreme Court has ruled in favor in Congress after TikTok appealed a federal court decision that upheld federal law potentially banning TikTok in the United States due to national security concerns. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reilly, New York State United Teachers, Latham (Jacquelyn Hadam of counsel), for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reilly, New York State United Teachers, Latham (Jacquelyn Hadam of counsel), for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 4:20 am
by Dennis Crouch A new petition for certiorari asks the Supreme Court to resolve a critical question about the global reach of U.S. trade secret law: Does the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) allow American companies to recover damages for trade secret misappropriation that occurs outside the United States? [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am
United States, Shah v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 12:00 am
Disqualification for engaging in insurrection is no different from disqualification based on other constitutional requirements such as age, citizenship from birth and 14 years’ residency in the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 12:32 pm
The Supreme Court applied the approach articulated in Bruen in United States v Rahimi (Rahimi). [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 6:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 9:32 am
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES [598 U.S. 411 *; 143 S. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 9:16 am
Here, however, we would like to add to the news with the recent decision recognizing an investment arbitration award against Mexico in United Mexican States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Approximately 150 million people in the United States access the application every month. [read post]