Search for: "Petition of Pitt"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2007, 3:24 pm
"I think it's very unlikely that we'll petition for a rehearing. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
The judgment in Exxon (split 2-1) is particularly striking in its criticism of the majority opinion in Kiobel, not least because the Exxon judgment operates as a kind of Kiobel rehearing, in that the Exxon plaintiffs relied on a number of amicus briefs that were filed in support of the petition for rehearing en banc in Kiobel, which the Second Circuit had denied. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:26 pm
Pitts v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
Pitts). [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 9:39 am
” David Pitt Real Clear Politics. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
Pitts: “Exaggerated Rumours of the Death of an Alien Tort? [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 4:52 am
The petition simply declares their views to be harmful and maintains that “this harassment and antagonism are not part of the exercise of free speech. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
The proposed rule for Swine Slaughter Modernization and a controversial National Chicken Council petition about line speeds both caused the agency leaders to direct some traffic their way. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:18 pm
From footnote 2:When it petitioned the board for rehearing, PowerIntegrations argued that the board had “misapprehendedor overlooked” its principal argument regarding theproper interpretation of the term “coupled. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:49 am
Pitts, 411 U.S. 138 (1973) and Vt. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 5:41 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied Chicago Bridge’s Petition for Review of the FTC’s order requiring divestitures after Chicago Bridge acquired Pitts-Des Moines’ (”PDM”). [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:58 am
Pitts, 411U.S. 138,142-143(1973) (per curiam) (judicial review is focused on "the administrative record"). [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:58 am
Pitts, 411U.S. 138,142-143(1973) (per curiam) (judicial review is focused on "the administrative record"). [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
The high court granted the state's petition for review of a 9th U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
But where the professor’s own publications elsewhere strike a balance by at least acknowledging and crediting references with views opposing her own (see Petition, Sec. 5.5.1), it appears that the White House overruled her approach, as the PAE Report generally fails the objectivity requirement of the IQA. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 6:04 pm
There was no dissent in the court of appeals and it does not appear that the State has petitioned the state supreme court for discretionary review. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:39 am
William Pitts, Jr. and Christopher Blackburn, 115 USPQ2d 1099 (TTAB 2015) [precedential] [TTABlogged here]. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:53 am
In its petition, the firm argued that the Board is a congressional attempt to create a ``Fifth Branch'' of the federal government over which the President has less control than over ``Fourth Branch'' agencies like the SEC, which currently reflect the outermost constitutional limits of congressional restrictions on the executive. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:34 am
Pitts, 481 F.3d 1279, 1286 (10th Cir.2007)). [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
The majority reinstated the petition and remanded the proceeding to the Regional Director for further appropriate action. [read post]
