Search for: "Petition of Smith" Results 101 - 120 of 2,799
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alison L. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Front, Inc. v Khalil, 24 NY3d 713, 718 [2015], citing Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214,220 [1897].) [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 8:26 am by Josh Blackman
Second, we learn there was broad consensus to reject Jack Smith's petition for certiorari before judgment: The immunity case first arrived at the justices' door in December. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 10:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Oldham wrote for the court, joined by Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Ho Duncan, Englehardt and Wilson. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am by Michael W. McConnell, Pamela S. Karlan
But when they got to the Supreme Court, the cert petition came in and it said, basically, “is the president absolutely immune for acts he committed as president? [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 9:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Edith Jones wrote for the majority, joined by Chief Judge Richman and Judges Smith, Elrod, Southwick, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Cannon concluded that special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:46 am by Josh Blackman
However, Special Counsel Jack Smith's prosecution of Donald Trump presents just that opportunity for Morrison to be overruled. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As this language must be strictly construed in view "of the constitutional provision against the expenditure of public funds absent express statutory authority",  "overtime payments are not duly authorized or considered as salary within the meaning of General Municipal Law §90 unless paid pursuant to 'an overtime plan setting forth in detail the terms, conditions and remuneration for such employment'".In this instance the Appellate Division annulled so… [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"As this language must be strictly construed in view "of the constitutional provision against the expenditure of public funds absent express statutory authority",  "overtime payments are not duly authorized or considered as salary within the meaning of General Municipal Law §90 unless paid pursuant to 'an overtime plan setting forth in detail the terms, conditions and remuneration for such employment'".In this instance the Appellate Division annulled so… [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The co-defendant, Walt Nauta, who works as a personal aide to Trump, had accused prosecutors in the office of the special counsel, Jack Smith, of unfairly indicting him because he declined to help their efforts to build a case against the former president by testifying against him in front of a grand jury. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:21 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 1:38 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Lentner & Weronika Cenin, Daniel Billy et al v Australia (Torres Strait Islanders Petition): Climate change inaction as a human rights violation       [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Thomas argued both that the special counsel’s office needs to be established by Congress and Smith needed to be confirmed by the Senate. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:41 am by Eugene Volokh
You can read the majority and dissenting opinions in the Fifth Circuit here, and the petition, response, and reply here. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
New Jersey AG: Hey Smith & Wesson, nice-looking documents you got there, mind if we take a look? [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:11 pm by Josh Blackman
She turns away all emergency petitions on the shadow docket (unless they're from the Fifth Circuit). [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
              In a prior post, I have analyzed the justices’ treatment of the questions presented in the petition in Smith v. [read post]