Search for: "Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2014, 11:07 am by James Kachmar
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., et al., approximately 18 months ago. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer should be extended from copyright law to patent law, allowing laches to remain a defense to legal relief in a patent infringement suit. [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:00 am by Cicely Wilson
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., US Supreme Court (5/19/14)Civil Procedure, Copyright, Entertainment & Sports LawThe Copyright Act protects works published before 1978 for 28 years, renewable for up to 67 years, 17 U.S.C. 304(a). [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:59 pm by Mary Dwyer
The petition of the day is: Petrella v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:54 am by David Baker
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., the Supreme Court held that Paula Petrella, daughter of the late screenwriter Frank Petrella, did not wait too long to file her lawsuit against Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer claiming an interest in the film. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:54 am by David Baker
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., the Supreme Court held that Paula Petrella, daughter of the late screenwriter Frank Petrella, did not wait too long to file her lawsuit against Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer claiming an interest in the film. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:39 pm by RatnerPrestia
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 572 U.S. ___ (2014), which related to the applicability of laches in copyright infringement claims. [read post]