Search for: "Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc" Results 41 - 60 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2014, 10:17 am by Scott Bomboy
So in what the boxing world would consider a split decision, the daughter of the man who wrote a 1963 screenplay about boxer Jake LaMotta can pursue a copyright damages case against Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. over profits from the “Raging Bull” movie. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., reporting that “[l]awyers on both sides of a copyright case involving the 1980 film Raging Bull fought to an apparent draw. [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:40 am
The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ruled today in Petrella v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. that laches cannot bar legal claims for actual damages or profits arising out of copyright infringement (17 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 12:37 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., Defendant Lancia Homes argued that a claim for copyright infringement accrues at the time of the infringing act. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:10 am by Scott Bomboy
The liberal-conservative alliance agreed that the daughter of Frank Petrella, who wrote a screenplay about boxer Jake LaMotta, can pursue a copyright damages case against Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. over profits from the “Raging Bull” movie. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, No. 12-1315 (slip op., May 19, 2014), Justice Breyer declared: “Legal systems contain doctrines that help courts avoid the unfairness that might arise were legal rules to apply strictly to every case no matter how unusual the circumstances. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
Last Monday the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Petrella v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:37 am by Eric Caligiuri
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., the Supreme Court had previously held that laches cannot be used as a defense in a copyright infringement action brought within the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations period. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 10:03 am by Audrey A Millemann
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 1962 (2014) eliminated laches as a defense. [read post]
23 May 2016, 10:34 am by Darren Franklin
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. that a defendant cannot invoke laches to bar a claim for damages under the Copyright Act, because the Copyright Act contains a statute of limitations that already takes the plaintiff’s delay into account. 134 S. [read post]