Search for: "Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2014, 12:13 pm by Kali Borkoski
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. is here. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:49 am by Andrew Hamm
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 5:23 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., a case in which plaintiff Paula Petrella sued MGM Studios and a variety of other major players in the film industry for “infring[ing] her purported interest in a book and two screenplays that together allegedly formed the basis for the 1980 motion picture Raging Bull. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:32 pm by Patent Docs
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., decided three years ago; 2) the Justices' questioning at oral argument presaged how they were thinking; and 3) it was, after all, a Federal Circuit decision. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:15 am by Rob Kramer
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (2014), which held that laches is inapplicable for copyright... [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by John W. Mashni
Metro-Goldwyn Mayer, Inc., the Court considered the question of whether the doctrine of laches is available as a defense to copyright infringement. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:15 am by Stacy K. Marcus
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., and ways for businesses to adapt in light of the shocking decision. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:07 am by James Kachmar
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., et al., approximately 18 months ago. [read post]