Search for: "Pettis v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's complaint simply stated "the coworker was less qualified and less experienced than [Plaintiff]" rather than allege coworker had the same job title as Plaintiff, had the same responsibilities or job requirements as Plaintiff, reported to the same supervisors as Plaintiff, or that she was even employed in the same unit as Plaintiff. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's complaint simply stated "the coworker was less qualified and less experienced than [Plaintiff]" rather than allege coworker had the same job title as Plaintiff, had the same responsibilities or job requirements as Plaintiff, reported to the same supervisors as Plaintiff, or that she was even employed in the same unit as Plaintiff. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 4:58 am by SHG
Making videos of small animals being crushed by high heels may be protected First Amendment activity (really, see United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
To that end, this Essay analyzes an undisturbed line of Supreme Court cases from 1980-1990 – United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:35 am by CMC
There is much to unpack in the Supreme Court’s decision in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am by Mark Ashton
With a few exceptions the Supreme Courts of the United States both in Washington and 50 state capitals are courts of “limited jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:11 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Fla. 2019), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida explained that what constitutes “outrageous” conduct is a question of law. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Almost all states had some kind of blue-sky law by 1931. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm by Mark Ashton
Ed. 666, 676-77 (1872); see also Note, The Establishment Clause and Religion in Child Custody Disputes, 82 Mich.L.Rev. 1702, 1716 n. 49 (1984) (collecting other United States Supreme Court cases). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
Held, the only defamatory element of the article was that Mr Ismaik was convicted in Jordan in financial cases involving petty sums of money; and that he was prosecuted in a major money laundering case. [read post]