Search for: "Pettis v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:15 pm
That’s not a crime under North Carolina law, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held today in State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:58 am by Elina Saxena
U.S. forces have flown three air patrols near the shoal this month, heightening tensions between the United States and China. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 10:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
The interpretation of the United States Constitution on this important issue is overdue and resolved most appropriately by this Court. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am by Ben
"Judge Learned Hand United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitInspiration or appropriation? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's complaint simply stated "the coworker was less qualified and less experienced than [Plaintiff]" rather than allege coworker had the same job title as Plaintiff, had the same responsibilities or job requirements as Plaintiff, reported to the same supervisors as Plaintiff, or that she was even employed in the same unit as Plaintiff. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's complaint simply stated "the coworker was less qualified and less experienced than [Plaintiff]" rather than allege coworker had the same job title as Plaintiff, had the same responsibilities or job requirements as Plaintiff, reported to the same supervisors as Plaintiff, or that she was even employed in the same unit as Plaintiff. [read post]
9 May 2007, 12:55 am
On June 22, 2006, the United State Supreme Court decided Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:49 pm
The practice was found to be unconstitutional under the 4th Amendment in Shain v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm by Steve Statsinger
Several Interesting per curiams rounded out 2011:In United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:50 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  In 2004, the United States Supreme Court answered this question in the case of Hiibel v. [read post]