Search for: "Pettis v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2007, 5:55 am
" United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
The United States Code does not define “moral turpitude. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:15 pm
That’s not a crime under North Carolina law, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held today in State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:58 am
U.S. forces have flown three air patrols near the shoal this month, heightening tensions between the United States and China. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 10:33 pm
The interpretation of the United States Constitution on this important issue is overdue and resolved most appropriately by this Court. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
"Judge Learned Hand United States Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitInspiration or appropriation? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Plaintiff's complaint simply stated "the coworker was less qualified and less experienced than [Plaintiff]" rather than allege coworker had the same job title as Plaintiff, had the same responsibilities or job requirements as Plaintiff, reported to the same supervisors as Plaintiff, or that she was even employed in the same unit as Plaintiff. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Plaintiff's complaint simply stated "the coworker was less qualified and less experienced than [Plaintiff]" rather than allege coworker had the same job title as Plaintiff, had the same responsibilities or job requirements as Plaintiff, reported to the same supervisors as Plaintiff, or that she was even employed in the same unit as Plaintiff. [read post]
9 May 2007, 12:55 am
On June 22, 2006, the United State Supreme Court decided Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:49 pm
The practice was found to be unconstitutional under the 4th Amendment in Shain v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
Several Interesting per curiams rounded out 2011:In United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
In Monday’s argument in Nieves v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 11:08 pm
The case was Gideon v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 11:33 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:21 am
"United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:06 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:29 pm
Supreme Court in Romer v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:50 am
In 2004, the United States Supreme Court answered this question in the case of Hiibel v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:37 pm
The case is styled United States of America v. [read post]
