Search for: "Pettis v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 352
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2011, 5:52 am by thejaghunter
  Image link above ~~~~~~~~~~ Attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941 Click on underlined “hot-links” Cemetery Watchmen Ashes found in trash led to proper burial LISTEN, REFLECT, and PRAY MANSIONS OF THE LORD – United States Military Academy Mens Glee Club THE NAVY HYMN – United States Naval Academy Mens Glee Club ECHO TAPS – United States Marine Corps Band ~~~~~~~~~~ Captain William Edward Nordeen,… [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 8:26 am by Susan I. Nelson
Kentucky -- a deportation case involving a 40-year lawful permanent resident of the United States who was a Vietnam War veteran. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:20 pm by Viking
Fay Observer reports that: Jurors in the court-martial of a Fort Bragg soldier [United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:50 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  In 2004, the United States Supreme Court answered this question in the case of Hiibel v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:08 am by Daniel Bell
The United States filed an amicus brief in supporter of the Borough. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Castillo then asked the Court of Appeal, which looked at cases from the United States Supreme Court (Williams v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:31 am by Rita Zhao
For example, the United States does not have a treaty with any other country for enforcing judgments. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:46 pm by Ken
” Saxe, 240 F.3d at 204; see also United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:14 am by abiinniss
The obvious advantage is that there is less burden on the courts to deal with petty matters which often permeate the Magistrates courts and which could be dealt with by mediation. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:51 am
Right to an Attorney The Supreme Court of the United States held in Gideon v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am by Mike
 Judge William Alsup stated the United States Supreme Court 'has not yet made a clear ruling that admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ.' Holley v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Sometimes we might be tempted to think the petty functionaries have a point. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 8:59 pm by Susan I. Nelson
Proponents of the change advocate amending the Constitution of the United States in order to create an underclass of stateless children. [read post]