Search for: "Pettis v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court questions whether lawyers, of which the United States has no shortage, provide more social utility than scientists, engineers, and inventors. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
The obvious advantage is that there is less burden on the courts to deal with petty matters which often permeate the Magistrates courts and which could be dealt with by mediation. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:50 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Salem State College 2nd Cir.o A Win for Working MothersChadwick v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Sometimes we might be tempted to think the petty functionaries have a point. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 10:32 am
Stewart v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:42 am
As I explain in the post, within hours after Ali refused to step forward for military induction, the New York State Athletic Commission withdrew his license to fight on the ground that licensing a man who refused induction was “detrimental to the best interests of boxing”; and, within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, thereby effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
Held, the only defamatory element of the article was that Mr Ismaik was convicted in Jordan in financial cases involving petty sums of money; and that he was prosecuted in a major money laundering case. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 6:07 am
In this case, suit was brought in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:39 am
In a more rational world, perhaps a United States congresswoman would not call upon colleges to violate the Constitution, to act lawlessly for the sake of woman at the expense of men. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:00 am
In the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 8:38 am
State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 6:00 am
Büchel and the 5Pointz Michelangelos v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:54 am
The blogger that started this — “GottaLaff,” at the The Political Carnival — is luxuriating in the reflected glow of petty fame from having reported an asshole on Facebook to the Secret Service. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Biological Paternity Isn't Determinative - Cornelio v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 4:23 pm
From Hiers v. [read post]
