Search for: "Pettis v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2022, 7:34 am by Jonathan H. Adler
But I do not share the Court's view that Congress ratified the Solicitor General's brief confessing error in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by admin
(rejecting per se inadmissibility of eyewitness expert witness opinion testimony). [9] State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Mississippi State Representatives still support the Confederacy – 2017 (AP Photo/Rogelio V. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Jason Kelley
And what we found was that almost every major law enforcement agency across the United States already has these tools. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 4:41 am by Peter J. Sluka
Many disputes in closely-held companies feature one outspoken owner feuding with a united group of the remaining owners over management or participation in the company. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 5:15 pm by David Oscar Markus
United States, 447 U.S. 649 (1980); United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:23 pm
  For those of you who don't know, the Marshall Islands have had (and have) a special status with the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff Edmund Di Liscia, a devout Chassidic Jew and a Sailor in the United States Navy with a rating as an Electricians Mate, Nuclear Power 3rd Class Petty Officer (EMN3), seeks emergency relief to stop Defendants from forcing him to shave in violation of his sincerely held religious beliefs.2. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Susan Landau
According to the report, 2,000 of the United States’s 18,000 law enforcement agencies, including 50 of the nation’s largest police departments, either have purchased MDFTs or have access to these tools. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Yet if that explains (albeit without justifying) the majority’s rejection of the due process and equal protection claims, a threshold requirement of support in constitutional text cannot explain the bottom line in Jones, because the plaintiffs also relied on an express constitutional text.They invoked the Twenty-Fourth Amendment, which provides: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote” in any federal election “shall not be denied or abridged by… [read post]