Search for: "Pettis v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Leon Friedman
  His persistence would change the face of criminal justice in the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Yet if that explains (albeit without justifying) the majority’s rejection of the due process and equal protection claims, a threshold requirement of support in constitutional text cannot explain the bottom line in Jones, because the plaintiffs also relied on an express constitutional text.They invoked the Twenty-Fourth Amendment, which provides: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote” in any federal election “shall not be denied or abridged by… [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 4:58 am by SHG
Making videos of small animals being crushed by high heels may be protected First Amendment activity (really, see United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 10:03 pm
MOSLEY, 423 U.S. 96 (1975) AND UNITED STATES v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:50 am by Sandy Levinson
  Whether this would have been good for the United States is certainly debatable. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:28 pm by Steve Vladeck
Against the al-Nashiri backdrop, the government has now filed its brief on the merits in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
To that end, this Essay analyzes an undisturbed line of Supreme Court cases from 1980-1990 – United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Before sentencing, however, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the basis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in R.A.V. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Petty, Accommodating 'Religion', (Tennessee Law Review, Forthcoming).Mohammad Fadel, Religious Law, Family Law and Arbitration: Shari'a and Halakha in America, (Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 1, 2015).Marie Ashe, Hosanna-Tabor, the Ministerial Exemption, and Losses of Equality: Constitutional Law and Religious Privilege in the US, (2 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2015)).Adam Lamparello, Why Chief Justice Roy Moore and the Alabama Supreme Court Just Made the Case… [read post]