Search for: "Petty v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2007, 4:53 pm
In case where trial court held petitioner to answer a charge of petty theft with a prior, charge is dismissed as welfare fraud conviction under Welfare and Institutions Code section 11483 cannot be used as the prior (theft-related) conviction for a Penal Code section 666 criminal charge of petty theft with a prior Bradwell v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
Superior Court  are  hired by presidentially appointed  judges. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 10:44 am
According to the underlying dependency petition—as it was ultimately sustained by the juvenile court—K.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
"Superior court" is defined as the Supreme Court or a County Court (see CPL 10.10 [2]). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:11 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Here is what Justice Corbett of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice had to say recently in Sri Guru Nanak Sikh Centre Brampton v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 11:23 am by Stephen Bilkis
193 Misc.2d 432 751 N.Y.S.2d 351 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 1:56 pm by Evan M. Levow
Appeals from a municipal court conviction go to the Superior Court, Law Division. [read post]
6 May 2018, 1:56 pm by Evan M. Levow
Appeals from a municipal court conviction go to the Superior Court, Law Division. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:14 pm
Superior Court (Pearson) (2010) 48 Cal.4th 564, 571.)People v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 5:49 am by Anthony J. Vecchio
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket No. 58780. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:50 pm by Lauren Moak
The Superior Court’s opinion clarifies that an employee’s off-duty conduct must have a non-speculative impact on the employer’s business in order to constitute “just cause” for termination.A Hairy SituationThe case of Michael Christopher Designs v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 10:51 am by Tony Bui
A recent Superior Court decision highlights the dangers of poor meeting notices – these meetings were essentially dead before they hit the ground. 2030516 Ontario Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Nov. 19, 2019), the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Gallagher should be read to apply retroactively. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
Again, we find no error in the trial court's sentencing determination.The court in People v. [read post]