Search for: "Philip Bobbitt" Results 41 - 60 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2018, 10:06 am by Bob Bauer
The Impeachment Process Earlier this September, Yale University Press produced a new edition of Charles Black’s “Impeachment: A Handbook,” with substantial new scholarship added by Philip Bobbitt. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 3:25 pm
The ambition here is to discover the function of the War on Terror within an emerging neo-liberal world order.Most useful in that discovery is Philip Bobbitt's Terror and Consent, perhaps the most comprehensive disquisition so far on terrorism and the War on Terror. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 7:42 am by Zachary Burdette
Philip Bobbitt commented on Trump, the electoral college, and nuclear deterrence. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 10:13 am by Hadley Baker
Philip Bobbitt discussed the details of indicting and prosecuting a sitting president. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 8:01 am by Hannah Kris
Philip Bobbitt analyzed Alan Dershowitz’s arguments in an op-ed about foreign affairs and executive power that Dershowitz put forth to defend President Trump’s conduct.. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 12:00 am by karen shephard
University of Texas at Austin School of Law – Philip Bobbitt, Distinguished Senior Lecturer, University of Texas at Austin School of Law, as part of the Faculty Colloquia series. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 8:06 am by Ian Bartrum
You should know first that I endorse, and work within, Philip Bobbitt's approach to constitutional argument and interpretation.  [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 6:35 pm by JB
(Think about what drives second term presidents, for example.).Arguments from the future do not fit easily into Philip Bobbitt's famous account of the modalities of constitutional argument. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
” When a scholar I admire as much as Philip Bobbitt strongly disagrees and argues otherwise in these publication, I need to rethink my position and respond—either confessing error or explaining why I continue to hold to the views I originally expressed. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:59 pm
Here is the abstract: This article builds on Philip Bobbitt's Wittgensteinian insights into constitutional argument and law. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
Arguing against the motion were Akhil Reed Amar, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale, and Philip Bobbitt, Herbert Wechsler Professor of Law at Columbia. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
The article explains the topical approach to constitutional argument and contrasts it with Philip Bobbitt’s well-known theory of “modalities” of constitutional argument. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 3:45 pm by Sandy Levinson
, Jeff Tulis (moderator)Philip Bobbitt, Jacob Gersen, Stephen Griffin, Tom McGarity, Stephen SkowronekSaturday (Eidman Courtroom)9:15-10:45am: Governance and the judiciary, Scot Powe (moderator)Adam Liptak, James Gibson, Alan Tarr11:00-12:15: Governance from the State perspective, Lynn Baker (moderator)Bruce Cain, John Dinan1:30-3:30pm: Thinking about the future (and outside the box?) [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 1:14 pm by Lawrence Solum
In a pair of path-breaking books, Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution and Constitutional Interpretation, Philip C. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 3:12 am by Jack Goldsmith
”) Philip Bobbitt has another interesting piece, this time in the FP, on the intersection of law and strategy in the Syria matter. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:40 am by Benjamin Wittes
The interrogation of Guy Fawkes–which was not pretty–and its interesting relation to modern interrogation disputes is also the subject of a brief but fascinating discussion in Philip Bobbitt’s monumental book, Terror and Consent:  The Wars of the Twenty-First Century.  [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm by Sandy Levinson
  But his principal fame now is as the author of the slender book recently republished by the Yale Press with much new material added by my friend and colleague Philip Bobbitt. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 7:44 am
Truthmakerless constitutional theories like those of Judge Posner, Eric Segall or the early Felix Frankfurter cannot vindicate “wrong the day it was decided” (WTDIWD) data from the Court itself, and irreducibly plural constitutional theories like those of Philip Bobbitt cannot vindicate such data in cases where constitutional modes conflict. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:47 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Slick
Intelligence Moderator: Philip Bobbitt (Professor of Law, Columbia University) Joan Dempsey (former Executive Director of the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board) Brett Holmgren (National Security Council Senior Director for Intelligence Programs) Kenneth Wainstein (former Homeland Security Advisor and FBI General Counsel) 10:30 - 11:30 am       Safeguarding Civil Liberties and Countering Terrorism Moderator: Kenneth Wainstein David Medine… [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 12:43 pm by Carrie Cordero
There are three responses pieces: one by Steve Slick (online version here and pdf here), Director of the Intelligence Studies Project at the University of Texas at Austin; one by Philip Bobbitt (online version here and pdf here), the Herbert Weschler Professor of Federal Jurisprudence at Columbia Law School and Distinguished Senior Lecturer at the University of Texas Law School; as well as my own response (online version here and pdf here). [read post]