Search for: "Philip Bobbitt" Results 61 - 80 of 132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2019, 11:58 am by Philip Bobbitt
Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, § 1563 (1833) The late Charles Black and I agreed that a sitting president may not be indicted (see pp. 111-112, 136 in Black & Bobbitt, Impeachment: A Handbook). [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 12:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
, Jeff Tulis (moderator)                   Philip Bobbitt, Jacob Gersen, Stephen Griffin, Tom McGarity, Stephen SkowronekSaturday (Eidman Courtroom)9:15-10:45am:  Governance and the judiciary, Scot Powe (moderator)                   Adam Liptak, James Gibson, Alan Tarr11:00-12:15:  Governance… [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
In response Laurence Tribe’s argument that a sitting president can be indicted, Philip Bobbitt asserted the opposite. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
. *  * * UPDATE: The original signatories, as reported in Politco, were Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney, Matthew Waxman, David Rivkin, Philip Bobbitt, and Peter Keisler.  [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:03 pm by Ian Bartrum
As Philip Bobbitt said “law is something we do, not something we have”.   [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:55 am by JB
One important task of this article is to rethink the familiar model of modalities of argument offered by Philip Bobbitt and Richard Fallon; and to offer a different version that better reflects the multiple ways that lawyers and judges actually use history in constitutional argument.Fourth, according to the New Originalism, arguments about adoption history can offer mandatory answers only with respect to questions of interpretation; they cannot do so for questions of constitutional… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:49 am by Victoria Clark
Philip Bobbitt criticized the argument that the president can pardon himself. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 7:59 am
One important task of this article is to rethink the familiar model of modalities of argument offered by Philip Bobbitt and Richard Fallon; and to offer a different version that better reflects the multiple ways that lawyers and judges actually use history in constitutional argument. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:18 am by Garrett Hinck
Philip Bobbitt argued that North Korea has misunderstood the United States’ disincentives to push for regime change in Pyongyang. [read post]
2 May 2018, 8:17 am by Vanessa Sauter
Philip Bobbitt announced the latest edition of the Hoover Institution’s Aegis Paper Series. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 7:30 am by Victoria Clark
” Finally, Philip Bobbitt responded to Sam Roggeveen’s critique of his plan to end the Korean crisis for good. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:10 pm by Vanessa Sauter
  Philip Bobbitt offered an alternative approach to defusing the ongoing crisis with North Korea. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:56 am by Victoria Clark
Philip Bobbitt responded to a critique of his proposal to end the Korean War. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Bobbitt is the Herbert Wechsler Professor of Federal Jurisprudence and director for the Center for National Security at Columbia Law School. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 11:51 am by Victoria Gallegos
Philip Bobbitt argued why the Senate should not hold a late impeachment trial. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:17 am by Victoria Gallegos
Philip Bobbitt argued against a late Senate impeachment trial. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Philip Bobbitt writes that the House should pause the impeachment process. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 4:29 am by Benjamin Wittes
Philip Bobbitt always reminds people that we need to integrate law and strategy. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 9:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Columbia Law’s Philip Bobbitt wrote in with thoughts about—yes, you guessed it—Edward Snowden matters. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 8:11 am
McCain would undoubtedly have picked Terror and Consent, by my friend Philip Bobbitt, which could certainly serve as the basis for further questions by an informed moderator.I never want to see Jim Lehrer moderating a debate again. [read post]