Search for: "Philip Bobbitt" Results 61 - 80 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm by Mary Whisner
& Philip Bobbitt, Impeachment: A Handbook (2018). [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Matthew Waxman
It also bolsters several arguments that Philip Bobbitt makes in his incisive review of John Hart Ely’s “War and Responsibility” (Michigan Law Review, 1994). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:24 am by Ken Kersch
I would think, for instance, that Wilkinson would like the approach to the question taken in Philip Bobbitt’s book Constitutional Fate: A Theory of the Constitution (Oxford, 1984), which sets out, not a single “best” method, but surveys a variety of valuable and defensible interpretative approaches, all of which are held as arrows in a judge’s quiver. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 10:48 pm
In this respect, Posner's opposite number is not a usual liberal suspect like Laurence Tribe, but Philip Bobbitt, who argues for the value of multiple modalities of interpretation.Posner won praise from liberals for criticizing Robert Bork's originalism when Bork was nominated for the Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 12:20 pm
In today's NYT, superprawf  Philip Bobbitt and former senator and ambassador John C. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 1:08 pm by Victoria Kwan
Bobbitt and Akhil Reed Amar. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 9:57 am by Lawrence Solum
Professor Philip Bobbitt, University of Texas Law School "Can Justice Holmes add insight to...contemporary debate? [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:10 am by Joe Hodnicki
Furthermore, like Philip Bobbitt’s typology of constitutional argument, this typology of constitutional irrelevancy serves more than just an organizational function. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 10:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
A week ago, Lawfare published an extensive critique of my proposals, “Helsinki in Asia: A Response to Philip Bobbitt,” by the Australia strategic analyst Sam Roggeveen. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:47 am by Lawrence Solum
Public international law (Philip Bobbitt, Columbia Law School). 6. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:58 am by Philip Bobbitt
Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, § 1563 (1833) The late Charles Black and I agreed that a sitting president may not be indicted (see pp. 111-112, 136 in Black & Bobbitt, Impeachment: A Handbook). [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 12:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
, Jeff Tulis (moderator)                   Philip Bobbitt, Jacob Gersen, Stephen Griffin, Tom McGarity, Stephen SkowronekSaturday (Eidman Courtroom)9:15-10:45am:  Governance and the judiciary, Scot Powe (moderator)                   Adam Liptak, James Gibson, Alan Tarr11:00-12:15:  Governance… [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
In response Laurence Tribe’s argument that a sitting president can be indicted, Philip Bobbitt asserted the opposite. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
. *  * * UPDATE: The original signatories, as reported in Politco, were Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney, Matthew Waxman, David Rivkin, Philip Bobbitt, and Peter Keisler.  [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:03 pm by Ian Bartrum
As Philip Bobbitt said “law is something we do, not something we have”.   [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 3:30 pm
" --Philip Bobbitt, Author of The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History, Director of the Center for National Security at Columbia University"In this timely book, Patterson and Afilalo remind us that international trade is not just crucial to prosperity, but to world peace as well. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
Indeed, the article says in conclusion (as Philip Bobbitt has noted) cost benefit analysis is "relentlessly tactical," not strategic; it also tends toward serial 'event specific catastrophism' as its analytic frame; and it is a method of evaluating proposed courses of action, not generating them, and hence promotes a strategically questionable tendency to reaction as a response to terrorism. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:31 pm by Lawrence Solum
Furthermore, like Philip Bobbitt’s typology of constitutional argument, this typology of constitutional irrelevancy serves more than just an organizational function. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:55 am by JB
One important task of this article is to rethink the familiar model of modalities of argument offered by Philip Bobbitt and Richard Fallon; and to offer a different version that better reflects the multiple ways that lawyers and judges actually use history in constitutional argument.Fourth, according to the New Originalism, arguments about adoption history can offer mandatory answers only with respect to questions of interpretation; they cannot do so for questions of constitutional… [read post]