Search for: "Philip Bobbitt" Results 81 - 100 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2010, 3:47 am by Lawrence Solum
Public international law (Philip Bobbitt, Columbia Law School). 6. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 8:53 pm
  Philip Bobbitt (I don't think he'd mind me identifying him), in an illuminating conversation (as they always are) with me today noted that this sentiment, the idea that what is prudence for an individual becomes a genuinely moral obligation for the ruler - and amplifies it -  is part of Machiavelli's thought in The Prince. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 As scholars like Philip Bobbitt and Richard Fallon have detailed in well-known works, American constitutional practice is organized around a legal grammar that determines which sorts of arguments are considered legitimate inputs into constitutional decisionmaking and which are not. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:58 am by Philip Bobbitt
Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, § 1563 (1833) The late Charles Black and I agreed that a sitting president may not be indicted (see pp. 111-112, 136 in Black & Bobbitt, Impeachment: A Handbook). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
*  * * UPDATE: The original signatories, as reported in Politco, were Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney, Matthew Waxman, David Rivkin, Philip Bobbitt, and Peter Keisler. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
In response Laurence Tribe’s argument that a sitting president can be indicted, Philip Bobbitt asserted the opposite. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 12:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
, Jeff Tulis (moderator)                   Philip Bobbitt, Jacob Gersen, Stephen Griffin, Tom McGarity, Stephen SkowronekSaturday (Eidman Courtroom)9:15-10:45am:  Governance and the judiciary, Scot Powe (moderator)                   Adam Liptak, James Gibson, Alan Tarr11:00-12:15:  Governance… [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Philip Bobbitt The court’s legitimacy rests on the notion that it follows the law, not the personal or ideological preferences of the justices who happen to serve on it at any given time. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
Indeed, the article says in conclusion (as Philip Bobbitt has noted) cost benefit analysis is "relentlessly tactical," not strategic; it also tends toward serial 'event specific catastrophism' as its analytic frame; and it is a method of evaluating proposed courses of action, not generating them, and hence promotes a strategically questionable tendency to reaction as a response to terrorism. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 3:30 pm
" --Philip Bobbitt, Author of The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History, Director of the Center for National Security at Columbia University"In this timely book, Patterson and Afilalo remind us that international trade is not just crucial to prosperity, but to world peace as well. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:03 pm by Ian Bartrum
  As Philip Bobbitt said “law is something we do, not something we have”. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:56 am by Victoria Clark
Philip Bobbitt responded to a critique of his proposal to end the Korean War. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 7:30 am by Victoria Clark
” Finally, Philip Bobbitt responded to Sam Roggeveen’s critique of his plan to end the Korean crisis for good. [read post]
2 May 2018, 8:17 am by Vanessa Sauter
Philip Bobbitt announced the latest edition of the Hoover Institution’s Aegis Paper Series. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 11:51 am by Victoria Gallegos
Philip Bobbitt argued why the Senate should not hold a late impeachment trial. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Bobbitt is the Herbert Wechsler Professor of Federal Jurisprudence and director for the Center for National Security at Columbia Law School. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:18 am by Garrett Hinck
Philip Bobbitt argued that North Korea has misunderstood the United States’ disincentives to push for regime change in Pyongyang. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 7:59 am
One important task of this article is to rethink the familiar model of modalities of argument offered by Philip Bobbitt and Richard Fallon; and to offer a different version that better reflects the multiple ways that lawyers and judges actually use history in constitutional argument. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:55 am by JB
One important task of this article is to rethink the familiar model of modalities of argument offered by Philip Bobbitt and Richard Fallon; and to offer a different version that better reflects the multiple ways that lawyers and judges actually use history in constitutional argument.Fourth, according to the New Originalism, arguments about adoption history can offer mandatory answers only with respect to questions of interpretation; they cannot do so for questions of constitutional… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:49 am by Victoria Clark
Philip Bobbitt criticized the argument that the president can pardon himself. [read post]