Search for: "Philip Bobbitt" Results 81 - 100 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2013, 9:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Columbia Law’s Philip Bobbitt wrote in with thoughts about—yes, you guessed it—Edward Snowden matters. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 2:23 am by Jack Goldsmith
Philip Bobbitt (Columbia Law School, and the author of, among many other things, Terror and Consent) writes in: Three thoughts on the Snowden matter. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 6:35 pm by JB
(Think about what drives second term presidents, for example.).Arguments from the future do not fit easily into Philip Bobbitt's famous account of the modalities of constitutional argument. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 4:29 am by Benjamin Wittes
Philip Bobbitt always reminds people that we need to integrate law and strategy. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 4:37 am by Benjamin Wittes
The latest come from Tod Lindberg, Amy Zegart, and Philip Bobbitt. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 3:45 pm by Sandy Levinson
, Jeff Tulis (moderator)Philip Bobbitt, Jacob Gersen, Stephen Griffin, Tom McGarity, Stephen SkowronekSaturday (Eidman Courtroom)9:15-10:45am: Governance and the judiciary, Scot Powe (moderator)Adam Liptak, James Gibson, Alan Tarr11:00-12:15: Governance from the State perspective, Lynn Baker (moderator)Bruce Cain, John Dinan1:30-3:30pm: Thinking about the future (and outside the box?) [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 12:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
, Jeff Tulis (moderator)                   Philip Bobbitt, Jacob Gersen, Stephen Griffin, Tom McGarity, Stephen SkowronekSaturday (Eidman Courtroom)9:15-10:45am:  Governance and the judiciary, Scot Powe (moderator)                   Adam Liptak, James Gibson, Alan Tarr11:00-12:15:  Governance… [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am by Joshua Matz
At Balkanization, Philip Bobbitt has posted an argument in the form of a mock amicus brief arguing that the Court could uphold the individual mandate under Congress’s power to provide for the “common Defence”; Mary Dudziak replies at the Legal History Blog.   [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:56 pm by Benjamin Wittes
See Philip Bobbitt, Terror and Consent: The Wars for the Twenty-first Century 403.  [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:07 pm by Guest Blogger
Philip Bobbitt[The following is an argument for the constitutionality of the individual mandate, written in the form of an amicus brief. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:24 am by Ken Kersch
I would think, for instance, that Wilkinson would like the approach to the question taken in Philip Bobbitt’s book Constitutional Fate: A Theory of the Constitution (Oxford, 1984), which sets out, not a single “best” method, but surveys a variety of valuable and defensible interpretative approaches, all of which are held as arrows in a judge’s quiver. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 12:13 pm by Kenneth Anderson
I also authored several essays for it, on the United Nations and global governance, Francis Fukuyama on neoconservatism, Philip Bobbitt on terrorism and the state, that were translated into a Spanish that made me out to be much smarter than I am.  [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:13 am by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) Philip Bobbitt is an old and dear friend, and I was privileged to meet his bride, the marvelous Maya Ondalikoglu, at a dinner in California last month.   [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:01 am by David Lat
Professor Philip Bobbitt In 2008, we profiled celebrity law professor Philip Bobbitt. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 7:34 pm by The Book Review Editor
Most of the offerings avoid polemic; a notable exception is the editors’ own introductory essay, which has an oddly sneering tone directed particularly at Philip Bobbitt and his book Terror and Consent.   [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 6:06 am by Kenneth Anderson
As Philip Bobbitt once remarked to me about fighting terrorism as an example of national security as strategy, the problem of applying cost benefit analysis in any serious way to these problems, as a consensus way forward, is that the serial minimalism of CBA leads to narrow incrementalism.   [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:40 am by Benjamin Wittes
The interrogation of Guy Fawkes–which was not pretty–and its interesting relation to modern interrogation disputes is also the subject of a brief but fascinating discussion in Philip Bobbitt’s monumental book, Terror and Consent:  The Wars of the Twenty-First Century.  [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 11:47 am by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) So concludes constitutional law and national security scholar Philip Bobbitt, in an email comment to Ben Wittes at Lawfare.   [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 7:23 am by Benjamin Wittes
Columbia law professor Philip Bobbitt, author of Terror and Consent: The Wars for the Twenty-First Century, writes in with the following comments in response to my comments on the Charlie Savage story: I don’t know if this is a “middle way” but I would have preferred that the Administration take the position that an internal legal memo is privileged, and that maintaining that privilege is pretty important to the Executive Branch; that for that reason it was irresponsible of… [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 12:40 pm by Benjamin Wittes
As Philip Bobbitt puts it: There is a virtually universal conviction that the constitutional rights of the People and the powers of the State exist along an axial spectrum. [read post]