Search for: "Phillips v. Bruce" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2008, 10:55 am
Jean Gilles Phillips and student interns Ashley Epperly and Sarah Pfieffer at the KU Defender Project won in Bledsoe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in King v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:50 am
Marcia Burris and Cheryl Nemeier will co-chair Summit V. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:42 pm by Bill Ward
The New York State Court Appeals heard oral arguments today in Goldstein v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 1:31 am by INFORRM
Hockey’s barrister Bruce McClintock SC has more than once been reprimanded by Justice Richard White for his legal flourishes and personal slights. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for Newsweek, Bruce Green urges the Supreme Court to review Acklin v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Fearon: Limited Warrantless Search of Cell Phones Permitted http://t.co/7ApgLJ7CUZ -> Supreme Court allows warrantless cell phone searches http://t.co/3ctUBJE7fF -> Cell phone searches legal say SCOC: R v Fearon http://t.co/sMz5kCnc8n -> Former federal privacy commissioner Bruce Phillips has died at 84 http://t.co/P5tdD6lFFS -> [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:36 pm by WSLL
Summary of Decision issued February 12, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Phillip v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 9:10 pm
 Praised be Arizona lawyers Lee Phillips, Natalie Jacobs, Charles Babbitt (related to Bruce Babbitt?) [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary contribution of its revenues… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary contribution of its revenues… [read post]