Search for: "Phillips v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2022, 7:46 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 7:46 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 12:46 pm
” Phillips v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:26 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia granted HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 8:30 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm
Phillips points to Carlson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:49 pm
From the Court's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:29 pm
Supp. 2d at 51–52; see also 5C PHILLIP E. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
Phillip J. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
”); Trs. of Columbia Univ. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 11:45 am
Here is the abstract: In District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:34 am
Phillip V. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
See Phillips v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am
Eli Lilly and CompanyCase number: 12-cv-2045 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia)Case filed: December 20, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: January 2, 2013 02/08/2013 05/09/2013 2013-13 SEC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Sally Tyler, Of Temples and Territory: The ICJ's Preah Vihear Decision and Implications for Regional Dispute Resolution, (University of the District of Columbia Law Review, Forthcoming).Shaun Alberto de Freitas, Doctrinal Sanction and the Protection of the Rights of Religious Associations: Ecclesia De Lange v The Presiding Bishop of the Methodist Church of Southern Africa, (Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 19, 2016).Nancy Levit, After… [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) Our first, second and third posts, based on briefs we submitted to the District Courts for the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, explained that because the president does not hold an “Office . . . under the United States,” he or she is not subject to the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
See Medicines Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:07 am
Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs, Phillip Gover, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:33 pm
From Phillips v. [read post]
