Search for: "Phillips v. Mobile" Results 61 - 80 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
(a) Greig v Stirling & anr (b) Hamaizia & Anor v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (c)  Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited (d) Mionis v Democratic Press SA & Ors (12) Who is the odd one out? [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:04 am by Eugene Volokh
(Image used with permission) I’m pleased to report that my Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic student Ashley Phillips and I just filed an amicus brief last week on behalf of the Cato Institute, in Baker v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
 Up to now, Cuozzo has not explained how a Phillips claim construction would impact the outcome of its inter partes review. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:30 pm
North American Phillips. [11] Atari, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
(a)  Hodge Jones & Allen LLP v Times Newspapers Ltd (b)  Brand v NGN (c)  Walliams v NGN. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm by stevemehta
Cox for “painful onychomycosis,” a condition that may limit mobility and impair peripheral circulation. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:32 pm
This contribution suggests that scents may be more easily registered in the near future as a consequence of the EU reform of trade marks and of some technological innovations.Scents are signs because they can convey information (Phillips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (No. 1) [1998] RPC 283, 298). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
The penalty is part of a consent decree filed in District Court today in which Mobil Guam and Mobil Marianas did not admit any liability or wrongdoing. [read post]