Search for: "Phillips v. Shaw" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2018, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Shawe’s allegations that the attorney defendants deceptively backdated a retainer agreement primarily relates to privilege assertions in the Delaware action, and not in New York, and, as such, is not actionable under § 487 (see Doscher v Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, 148 AD3d 523, 524 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” Merrily Archer v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm by Brad Pauley
Phillips (1985) 41 Cal.3d 29, 66, fn. 17 [after oral argument, the parties were invited to submit supplemental briefing regarding application of statute];  People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
It's a very interesting read, stemming from a case where the underlying claims have nothing to do with trade secrets.Also outside the non-compete context, but certainly relevant to non-compete claims, is the Appellate Court of Illinois decision in Carlson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 1:57 pm
  I will be speaking about the emergence of green building litigation with a focus on the Shaw Development v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Katz, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Palo Alto, CA Right now we’re in a complete mess; nobody knows what the law is. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Dennis Crouch
McBride, Scott McCaleb, Michael McCaleb, Ryan McCarthy, Richard McLaren, Dion Messer, John Molenda, Brian Pandya, Chad Pannell, Lee Perla, Matthew Phillips, Janet Phipps Burkhead, Thomas Puppa, George Quillin, Courtland Reichman, Edward Reines, Elizabeth Roesel, Elizabeth Rogers Brannen, Joshua Rothman, Adam Samansky, Jeff Schwartz, Beth Shaw, Chad Shear, William J. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]