Search for: "Phillips v. Sherman" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm by Alden Abbott
Applying the “rule of reason” and principles of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:46 pm by Guest Author
Proponents of Robert Bork’s (in)famous assertion that congressional intent of the Sherman Act was intended solely to protect consumer welfare, which Bork translated as allocative efficiency, will not be convinced. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:33 am by Gus Hurwitz
But surely she is correct: in a post-West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  It’s not simply how one tells the dancer from the dance; it’s also how one evaluates performances of Mozart or Beethoven on “original instruments,” as Malcolm Bilson performed, or on the most advanced Steinways, as was the case with Russell Sherman. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
Phillips of the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm disagreed then, and still disagrees now, with the FTC that a Section 2 Sherman Act violation can be established based on conduct that reasonably appears capable of making a significant contribution to maintaining monopoly power--which was the standard in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 1:16 pm by Rebecca Yergin
In reaching this conclusion, the Commission’s Opinion initially decided that 1-800 Contacts’ settlements were not immune from antitrust review under FTC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 12:31 pm by John P. Feldman and Andrew Bernasconi
  Judge Chappell concluded that, per the Supreme Court’s ruling in FTC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 12:31 pm by John P. Feldman and Andrew Bernasconi
  Judge Chappell concluded that, per the Supreme Court’s ruling in FTC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Jack Phillips, the baker whose refusal to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple took him to the Supreme Court this term in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Christie v. [read post]