Search for: "Phillips v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,872
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2022, 8:55 am
James Cleith Phillips (Chapman University, The Dale E. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 8:44 am
Id. at *11; see id. at *10 (citing Phillips v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 8:44 am
Id. at *11; see id. at *10 (citing Phillips v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 8:44 am
Id. at *11; see id. at *10 (citing Phillips v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) (memo in support of motion for preliminary injunction) in Phillips v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm
Up first is Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom, who argued for cake artist Jack Phillips in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 5:36 am
Phillips was a cake decorator. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 6:32 pm
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:57 am
The state points to Rumsfeld v. [read post]
“Voting Without State Checks and Balances? A Close Look at the Independent State Legislature Theory”
1 Dec 2022, 3:25 pm
The panel featured Carter Phillips (Sidley Austin LLP, Counsel of Record for… Continue reading The post “Voting Without State Checks and Balances? [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 7:07 am
” It’s Time to Prepare More Seriously for the Next. by Nikita Lalwani (@nikitaalalwani), Alasdair Phillips-Robins (@alasdairpr) and Sam Winter Levy (@SamWinterLevy) (June 15, 2021) The U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
Indeed, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm
As an initial matter, the ALJ rejected Petitioner’s assertion that trademark settlement agreements are not subject to antitrust scrutiny in light of FTC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:27 pm
Carter Phillips argues for Norfolk Southern Railway Company. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 10:44 am
” Lloyd v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 10:48 am
Former Commissioner Noah Joshua Phillips dissented, on the grounds that the complaint included a cause of action for “Unfair Discrimination” pursuant to Section 5 of the FTC Act. [read post]