Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2018, 3:10 pm by Michael E. Chapnick
Dan Phillips and Jamey Phillips, who each own a unit in the Palisades condominium in Panama City, Fla. and serve on the association’s board of directors, added a boat lift to the community’s dock in 2016 for their exclusive use without prior approval from the other unit owners. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am by INFORRM
More recently, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Zakharov v Russia stated that “the interception authorisation, … must clearly identify a specific person …or single set of premises”. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:45 am by NCC Staff
The 10th Amendment says that, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Additionally, the United States filed an amicus brief in the case. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
United States, reversing a Pennsylvania man’s conviction for making threats on Facebook. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
In 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided the following arbitration-related cases: In Cont'l Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:22 am by Jon Sands
Phillips, No. 11-30195 (12-26-12) (Rakoff, Sr. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
David Bederman of Atlanta will argue for the petitioner, Carter Phillips of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent, and Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of the Solicitor General’s office will argue as amicus curiae for the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At The World and Everything in It, Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 8:08 pm by FDABlog HPM
Thomas – Around this time last month, we wrote about the government’s motion for an order to show cause in United States v. [read post]