Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 1,102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
At The Daily Caller, Kevin Daley reports that “Christian baker Jack Phillips and the Colorado Civil Rights Commission … have resolved a legal dispute that set Phillips’ religious beliefs against the state’s public accommodations law”; the settlement “provides that the Commission will close an ongoing anti-discrimination probe of Phillips’s Masterpiece Cakeshop,” the subject of a high-profile Supreme Court case last… [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Schachtman
In the United States, silicosis litigation has been infused with fraud and deception, not by the defendants, but by the litigation industry that creates lawsuits. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 1:05 pm by John K. Ross
The law making Arkansas district courts part of state government wasn't fully implemented in Phillips County until 2017—after the alleged constitutional violations. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:07 am by NCC Staff
United States, a divided Court ruled that in general, law enforcement officers must get a court-approved warrant before they may gather data from cellphone towers showing where an individual was using a phone. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 1:16 pm by Rebecca Yergin
In reaching this conclusion, the Commission’s Opinion initially decided that 1-800 Contacts’ settlements were not immune from antitrust review under FTC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 9:35 pm by Domenic Powell
United States, Gundy is challenging his conviction for failing to register as a sex offender under the Sex Offender Notification and Registration Act (SORNA). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:32 am by neli
 On that front, this year’s biggest news is our new edition of the United States Constitution Annotated (CONAN), a comprehensive explanation of the United States Constitution and of the key Supreme Court cases that interpret it. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by INFORRM
  In A v United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights concluded that ‘the broader an [MP’s] immunity, the more compelling must be its justification in order that it can be said to be compatible with the Convention’ ([78]). [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
United States Fish and Wildlife Service and a very mysterious brief in opposition for United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 3:31 pm by Mike Mireles
This is the same claim construction standard articulated in Phillips v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:34 pm by Jeremy Gordon
Srinivasan challenges Phillips’ third contention, suggesting that United States v. [read post]