Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 1,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am by INFORRM
More recently, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Zakharov v Russia stated that “the interception authorisation, … must clearly identify a specific person …or single set of premises”. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:03 am by SHG
  Did you ever think you would hear that question uttered by the Chief Justice of the United States of America? [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
, Patently-O suggested including claims in provisionals was advisable because of the CAFC decision in Phillips v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm by Ellena Erskine
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:45 am by NCC Staff
The 10th Amendment says that, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:59 am by Carolyn Moskowitz
As Jason Cowart reports in the current issue of The Pomerantz Monitor, one of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions of 2010, Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:22 am by Joel Goldstein
Assistant to the Solicitor General Erica Ross, representing the United States, followed Phillips. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
In 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided the following arbitration-related cases: In Cont'l Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Additionally, the United States filed an amicus brief in the case. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:36 pm by WSLL
The case cited, United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
United States, reversing a Pennsylvania man’s conviction for making threats on Facebook. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
David Bederman of Atlanta will argue for the petitioner, Carter Phillips of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent, and Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of the Solicitor General’s office will argue as amicus curiae for the United States. [read post]