Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
United States, reversing a Pennsylvania man’s conviction for making threats on Facebook. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
Phillips v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
David Bederman of Atlanta will argue for the petitioner, Carter Phillips of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent, and Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of the Solicitor General’s office will argue as amicus curiae for the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:29 pm
BLOMQUIST v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:48 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:52 am
Executive officers swear an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
Phillips v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:59 pm
(citing Maddalone v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
” At The World and Everything in It, Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
Phillips of the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:16 pm
The employer-respondent will be represented by Carter Phillips of Sidley Austin, LLP. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 7:52 am
The qui tam case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Phillips, No. 11-30195 (12-26-12) (Rakoff, Sr. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Additionally, in Phillip v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
But in Phillips v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am
The appeal to the Supreme Court is due to be heard by Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]