Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 1,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
United States, reversing a Pennsylvania man’s conviction for making threats on Facebook. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
David Bederman of Atlanta will argue for the petitioner, Carter Phillips of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent, and Douglas Hallward-Driemeier of the Solicitor General’s office will argue as amicus curiae for the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:52 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Executive officers swear an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At The World and Everything in It, Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
Phillips of the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:16 pm
  The employer-respondent will be represented by Carter Phillips of Sidley Austin, LLP. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:22 am by Jon Sands
Phillips, No. 11-30195 (12-26-12) (Rakoff, Sr. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am by Adam Wagner
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am by Saf Hussain
The appeal to the Supreme Court is due to be heard by Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke. [read post]