Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 1,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
United States, reversing a Pennsylvania man’s conviction for making threats on Facebook. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:52 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Executive officers swear an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At The World and Everything in It, Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
Phillips of the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:16 pm
  The employer-respondent will be represented by Carter Phillips of Sidley Austin, LLP. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am by Adam Wagner
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:22 am by Jon Sands
Phillips, No. 11-30195 (12-26-12) (Rakoff, Sr. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am by Saf Hussain
The appeal to the Supreme Court is due to be heard by Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
Today’s live blog team comprises Lucy Hayes (Olswang), Anna Phillips (Nabarro), James Gliddon (CMS), Tom Sandeman (Nabarro), Emma Boffey (CMS) and Iona Millership (Olswang). 16.00 The Lord Advocate has now concluded his submissions for today. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm by Editor
iStock_000001063043Medium.jpg In immigration fraud prosecution, the FRE 106 rule of completeness is not violated by the partial admission of an asylum application that allegedly contained false signatures when the defendants could have sought introduction of the remainder of the application during the presentation of their case, in United States v. [read post]