Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
By Phillip Tate and Michael Kiely Two cases filed in Sacramento County, City of Cerritos v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
They include: (1) Nonnon v City of New York;2 (2) Simpson v City of New York;3 (3) Irizarry v City of New York;4 (4) Carollo v City of New York;5 (5) Walsh v City of New York;6 (6) Arisio v City of New York;7 (7) Parmigiano v City of New York;8 (8) Phillips v City of New York;9 and (9) Nessen v City of New York.10 There were 29 plaintiffs in the original nine actions. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
Phillip Brasher of the Des Moines Register discusses Monsanto v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, Ikhilov has stated a cause of action against the Lyubarskys to recover damages for contribution (see Schauer v Joyce, 54 NY2d at 5). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:14 pm by Eleonora Rosati
He submitted that current interpretation of fair use, eg Cariou v Prince, is different from what fair use used to be, say, 20 years ago] should be imported into these laws - as well as different approaches that have arisen in the course of these processes. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 7:56 am by Phillips & Associates
The United States is, in many ways, still recovering from the economic crisis that began in 2008, with millions of people still unemployed or underemployed. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:20 pm
I will miss not only Paul's superb advocacy on behalf of the United States, but also his wise counsel and keen legal analysis. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:03 am by Phillips & Associates
The “common thread” linking these incidents, the report stated, was the United States and its laws protecting workers. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
Why do Lee and Phillips misrepresent the intentionalist position? [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
Why do Lee and Phillips misrepresent the intentionalist position? [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm by Linda McClain
, this supposed disanalogy sets the stage for a further argument: if business owners (like Jack Phillips) or religious social service agencies (like Catholic Social Services, in Fulton) who sincerely object to same-sex marriage are denied exemptions from state or local antidiscrimination laws, they are being branded and treated as bigots argument. [read post]