Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm
Brennan of the United States Supreme Court stated in Furman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 10:48 am
MCINTOSH v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:22 am
Guy, et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
See Unifund CCR Partners v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:23 am
The circuit concluded Smith abrogated Remmer in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
At the time of his alleged violation of the state’s civil rights statute, Colorado did not recognize same-sex marriages as a matter of state law, and the United States Supreme Court had said nothing to suggest that limiting marriage to a man and a woman was unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:53 am
And the United States Supreme Court has already—unanimously—held that an economic boycott based on race, namely a boycott of white-owned businesses, is a constitutionally protected form of protest. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:47 pm
Heasley, Phillip V. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm
In Sienkiewicz v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:36 am
Phillip J. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:24 am
Lord Phillips ruled, for example, that the principle that the state must stand firm against permitting the use of evidence obtained under torture “applies to the state in which an attempt is made to adduce such evidence” but “it does not require this state, the United Kingdom, to retain in this country to the detriment of national security a terrorist suspect …” (para 153; see to similar effect Lord Hoffmann at paras… [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 1:54 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting and influential passage, most recently quoted by Judge Posner in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 6:05 pm
Tuesday’s second case is United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am
However, the court also stressed that Phillips’ refusal to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins occurred before the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am
Sirius XM Radio Inc., et al in the United States District Court, Central District of California [read post]
