Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2007, 3:07 pm
United States, No. 07-5716, which we previously discussed here. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Upshaw Industrials case pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District... [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
”); Ellamae Phillips Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 3:56 pm
Specifically, in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:40 am
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MARY BISHOP, ) SHARON BALDWIN, ) SUSAN BARTON, and ) GAY PHILLIPS, ) ) Plaintiffs, )) v. ) No. 04-CV-848-TCK-TLW ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ex rel. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
In Phillips v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
In Phillips v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 8:14 am
No. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (2001); Hamdan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 8:30 am
One could imagine other publics, such as everyone permanently in the United States, regardless of their ability to vote or citizenship status. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:04 pm
See United Steelworkers v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 6:00 am
In Phillips v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:03 am
From the Interesting Stuff Stumbled Upon While Looking For Something Else File comes United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:14 pm
On June 4, 2018, the Supreme Court of United States of America decided that the freedom to express religious beliefs would trump the right to equality. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 10:56 am
Specifically, in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 6:54 am
" United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 5:31 am
In its opinion in Luce v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 12:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
