Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 1,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 am by Lyle Denniston
Phillips of the Washington, D.C., office of Sidley Austin LLP, will represent the generic firms, with twenty-five minutes. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm by Jordan Bublick
  The 11th Circuit previously explained in the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am by Ben
Sirius XM Radio Inc., et al in the United States District Court, Central District of California [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm by Amanda Traphagan
In 1996, the State of Texas sued the Big Four tobacco manufacturers – Phillip Morris, R.J. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:42 pm
I was so sorry for him as Tillman made protest against equal suffrage for the Negro race in the United States that I must have missed much of Tillman’s oratorical effect. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am by Glenn
They’re just not an antitrust violation in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 714 F.3d 1311,1315 (Fed. [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
” Three federal judges have already found this statute unconstitutional (see Vives v the City of New York, 305 F Supp 2d 289, 299 [SD NY 2003, Scheindlin, J.], revd on other grounds 405 F3d 115 [2d Cir 2004] ["where speech is regulated or proscribed based on its content, the scope of the effected speech must be clearly defined"]; see also Vives 405 F3d 115, 123-124 [2d Cir 2004, Cardamone, J., dissenting in part, concurring in part] [Penal Law § 240.30(1)… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:14 pm by Eleonora Rosati
He submitted that current interpretation of fair use, eg Cariou v Prince, is different from what fair use used to be, say, 20 years ago] should be imported into these laws - as well as different approaches that have arisen in the course of these processes. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am by Kristen Fries
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia declared each of Alice’s patents invalid for not defining patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
Nakanishi, john a. powell, Maria Blanco, Howard Winant Indigenous Peoples: Response to the Periodic Report of the United States to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Tribal Self-Government in the United States John Dossett When Affirmative Action Was White Ira Katznelson The Importance of Targeted Universalism john a. powell, Stephen Menendian & Jason Reece Implicit Bias A Forum – eds. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm by Gene Quinn
On Monday, March 31, 2014, the United States Supreme Court held oral arguments in the much-anticipated software battle between patentee Alice Corporation, the petitioner, and CLS Bank, the respondent who was victorious below thanks to an equally divided Federal Circuit. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:41 pm by Ronald Mann
The biggest problem with Alice’s case (presented by Carter Phillips) is its similarity to Bilski v. [read post]