Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
There, United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 9:10 pm
(all from the Law Office of Lee Phillips, P.C.), , and Dan Pochoda (Arizona's ACLU legal director) for filing this Complaint on June 26, 2007, in Dan Ray Frazier v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 11:04 am
Reg. at 51,341 (citing the Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Having started off with the holiday, this has been a relatively slow week on the antitrust front in the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
United States Dep't of Agriculture Department of Agriculture 08a0397p.06 Davie v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am
And a second piece at Balkinization today argues that instead of overturning the Slaughter-House Cases, as the petitioners suggested, the Court should overturn its 1875 decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:27 am
United States U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:53 pm
Section 1981 provides: “All persons within the jurisdiction of the United State shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts…as is enjoyed by white citizens. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm
He thus notes that this incident occurred in 2012, before same-sex marriage was legal in Colorado or protected under the equal protection clause to the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
.] : Pennsylvania Bar Institute, c2011.KFP81 .P4 No.6789 AntitrustAntitrust law Fundamentals of antitrust law / Phillip E. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:47 pm
Several persons claiming to be victims of the crime charged in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 1:48 am
., United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944)). [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944)). [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:42 pm
United States, 414 U. [read post]
