Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2014, 2:30 am
” United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 11:15 am
A look at the facts of the case of Madden Phillips Construction v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
All across the United States, people are going to the polls today to vote in this year’s midterm elections. 19.3 million early votes have already been logged in the most expensive midterm election ever. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 am
Phillips of the Washington, D.C., office of Sidley Austin LLP, will represent the generic firms, with twenty-five minutes. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm
The 11th Circuit previously explained in the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 6:16 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am
Sirius XM Radio Inc., et al in the United States District Court, Central District of California [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:42 pm
I was so sorry for him as Tillman made protest against equal suffrage for the Negro race in the United States that I must have missed much of Tillman’s oratorical effect. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
They’re just not an antitrust violation in the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:36 am
See Phillips v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:45 pm
United States, 714 F.3d 1311,1315 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] New York’s ‘aggravated harassment’ statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
” Three federal judges have already found this statute unconstitutional (see Vives v the City of New York, 305 F Supp 2d 289, 299 [SD NY 2003, Scheindlin, J.], revd on other grounds 405 F3d 115 [2d Cir 2004] ["where speech is regulated or proscribed based on its content, the scope of the effected speech must be clearly defined"]; see also Vives 405 F3d 115, 123-124 [2d Cir 2004, Cardamone, J., dissenting in part, concurring in part] [Penal Law § 240.30(1)… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:14 pm
He submitted that current interpretation of fair use, eg Cariou v Prince, is different from what fair use used to be, say, 20 years ago] should be imported into these laws - as well as different approaches that have arisen in the course of these processes. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
Phillips 66 Co., 2013 U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia declared each of Alice’s patents invalid for not defining patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Nakanishi, john a. powell, Maria Blanco, Howard Winant Indigenous Peoples: Response to the Periodic Report of the United States to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Tribal Self-Government in the United States John Dossett When Affirmative Action Was White Ira Katznelson The Importance of Targeted Universalism john a. powell, Stephen Menendian & Jason Reece Implicit Bias A Forum – eds. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm
On Monday, March 31, 2014, the United States Supreme Court held oral arguments in the much-anticipated software battle between patentee Alice Corporation, the petitioner, and CLS Bank, the respondent who was victorious below thanks to an equally divided Federal Circuit. [read post]
