Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 1,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix.
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
But Chief Judge Roberts has previously voted against government interference in the marketplace of idea in cases like Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
  On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:24 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Lord Phillips ruled, for example, that the principle that the state must stand firm against permitting the use of evidence obtained under torture “applies to the state in which an attempt is made to adduce such evidence” but “it does not require this state, the United Kingdom, to retain in this country to the detriment of national security a terrorist suspect …” (para 153; see to similar effect Lord Hoffmann at paras… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am by Isabel McArdle
The Government of the United States of America -v- O’Dwyer, Westminster Magistrates’ Court – Read judgment It seems appropriate, on the day when Wikipedia shut down for 24 hours to protest against US anti-piracy legislation, to talk about piracy (in the copyright sense) and what role human rights law has to play in the perpetual battle against it. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Each of them had been viewed thousands or tens of thousands of times by individuals throughout the world, including the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Bouchart reports: The landmark ruling stated that although the work of journalist Denis Robert contained inaccuracies, the thoroughness of his investigation and the public interest in the story outweighed the defamatory claims. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am by Adam Wahlberg
[Backgrounder: in a ruling issued April 28, 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled to uphold the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) fleeting expletive rule.[12] The court reversed a lower court ruling in the 2nd U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:14 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]