Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 641 - 660 of 1,060
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
At The National Law Review, Evan Seeman looks at the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm by cdw
” [via LexisOne] Gallante Romar Phillips v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am by Benjamin Bissell
All across the United States, people are going to the polls today to vote in this year’s midterm elections. 19.3 million early votes have already been logged in the most expensive midterm election ever. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Brad Miller
State legislatures have discretion to set tax and spending priorities, the Supreme Court said in 1977 in United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Association of Foreign Press Correspondents in the United States (AFC-USA) also said in its response to the Department of Homeland Security’s proposals that they could put journalists from countries with poor human rights records in danger by forcing them to return home “where they risk retaliation because they’ve done critical, truthful reporting while in the States”. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am by SHG
United States, 136 S.Ct. 2272 (2016) • M. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:15 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; Michael L. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Supreme Court's recent decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Ben
District Judge Phillip Gutierrez ruled against SiriusXM in 2014, holding that California state law, as it is written, gives the master recording owner exclusive performance rights.In Florida a court found that there was no state law to protect pre-1972 recorded works. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:54 pm by Phillips & Associates
§ 60-1.5 requiring an interpretation of the exemption provisions that gives “broad protection of religious exercise, to the maximum extent permitted by the United States Constitution and law. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
" [speaking of Phillips v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am by Kedar Bhatia
United States, and three times during the Affordable Care Act cases. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:24 pm by Rosalind English
As for (both ante- and post-) nuptial agreements, Wilson J commented in S v S (Matrimonial Proceedings: Appropriate Forum) [1997] 1 WLR 1200, Where other jurisdictions, both in the United States and in the European Community, have been persuaded that there are cases where justice can only be served by confining parties to their rights under prenuptial agreements, we should be cautious about too categorically asserting the contrary. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1316 (citing SciMed Life Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 8:50 am by Phillips & Associates
The plaintiff in Avery worked for about three years as a server at “one of the finest restaurants in the United States. [read post]