Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 1,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am by SHG
United States, 136 S.Ct. 2272 (2016) • M. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:15 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; Michael L. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Supreme Court's recent decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Ben
District Judge Phillip Gutierrez ruled against SiriusXM in 2014, holding that California state law, as it is written, gives the master recording owner exclusive performance rights.In Florida a court found that there was no state law to protect pre-1972 recorded works. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:54 pm by Phillips & Associates
§ 60-1.5 requiring an interpretation of the exemption provisions that gives “broad protection of religious exercise, to the maximum extent permitted by the United States Constitution and law. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
" [speaking of Phillips v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am by Kedar Bhatia
United States, and three times during the Affordable Care Act cases. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1316 (citing SciMed Life Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:24 pm by Rosalind English
As for (both ante- and post-) nuptial agreements, Wilson J commented in S v S (Matrimonial Proceedings: Appropriate Forum) [1997] 1 WLR 1200, Where other jurisdictions, both in the United States and in the European Community, have been persuaded that there are cases where justice can only be served by confining parties to their rights under prenuptial agreements, we should be cautious about too categorically asserting the contrary. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 8:50 am by Phillips & Associates
The plaintiff in Avery worked for about three years as a server at “one of the finest restaurants in the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 10:56 am by Peter Tillers
In Phillips v R the court observed that: On one view, the problems presented by the tender of similar fact evidence are merely problems of relevance. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:54 pm by Randee Iles and Rebecca Guidry
 In their brief, the Defendants cite the following quote from the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit case of Archbold-Garrett v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:54 pm by Randee Iles and Rebecca Guidry
 In their brief, the Defendants cite the following quote from the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit case of Archbold-Garrett v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]