Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 721 - 740 of 1,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2010, 3:14 pm
It is undisputed that Honeywell performed this work in the United States prior to Solvay's priority date of October 23, 1995. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:02 pm
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
Three justices (you need four for an outright majority) agreed in a concurring opinion in Phillips v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
” Three federal judges have already found this statute unconstitutional (see Vives v the City of New York, 305 F Supp 2d 289, 299 [SD NY 2003, Scheindlin, J.], revd on other grounds 405 F3d 115 [2d Cir 2004] ["where speech is regulated or proscribed based on its content, the scope of the effected speech must be clearly defined"]; see also Vives 405 F3d 115, 123-124 [2d Cir 2004, Cardamone, J., dissenting in part, concurring in part] [Penal Law § 240.30(1)… [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am by Josh Blackman
Two months ago, the Supreme Court decided a similar case, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm by Mark Walsh
Up first is Kristen Waggoner of Alliance Defending Freedom, who argued for cake artist Jack Phillips in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
For Lord Phillips, and the other five judges in the majority, the Mirror Principle won out [62, per Lord Phillips]: “It would not be satisfactory for the Coroner to conduct an inquest that did not satisfy the requirements of Article 2, leaving open the possibility of the appellants making a claim against the United Kingdom before the Strasbourg Court. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
Mustafa Kamal MUSTAFA (ABU HAMZA) (No. 1) v the United Kingdom – 31411/07 [2011] ECHR 211 (18 January 2011): The European Court of Human Rights has rejected Abu Hamza’s claim that his trial in the United Kingdom for soliciting to murder, inciting racial hatred and terrorism charges was unfair. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
MunchkinPAC-MAN was originally developed and sold by Namco, but Atari and Midway owned the exclusive rights within the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Lyle Denniston
Since the Constitution was adopted, the United States has always had two levels of government — a national government that handles things which affect the states collectively, and state governments that look after matters within their borders. [read post]