Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2011, 5:47 pm
Heasley, Phillip V. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:02 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 12:07 pm
This seems consistent with United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:18 am
Joint tenancy is a common arrangement for owning real estate in California, and much of the United States for that. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
On the issue of justiciability of the claim based on infringement of United States copyright, the Court had this to say: "87. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:11 pm
Judge Phillips’ ruling is under review by the Ninth Circuit in the case of Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:34 am
State, supra (quoting Phillips v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:38 pm
United States, , 518 F.2d 584, 587 (Ct. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:38 am
” In two separate cases, Roy Phillip Ballard v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Lord Phillips held that the term “relating to” had to be construed more broadly than the precedents suggested: There is no principle of international law under which state A is immune from proceedings brought in state B in order to enforce a judgment given against it by the courts of state C, where state A did not enjoy immunity in respect of the proceedings that gave rise to that judgment. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
From the next edition: Relief granted Roy Phillip Ballard v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Defendants in Iraq oil for food case failed with appeal that criminal offences created by Government pursuant to s.1 United Nations Act 1946 were ultra vires because they were not created “promptly” Patmalneice v SOS Work & Pensions [2011] [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
(Class 99) (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC (Ch): Plane users can’t tell airlines from airways: United Airlines Inc v United Airways Limited (IPKat) PPC page 32: Quickstep – are there difficulties changing course with 8 tentacles? [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
