Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 741 - 760 of 1,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Indeed, it is a bit difficult to explain why, exactly, password guessing leads to unauthorized access — the Fifth Circuit was forced to explain that seemingly obvious conclusion in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Adam Feldman
The United States had one amicus brief this term with a composite score of over 90. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 9:26 am
JUSTICE SCALIA: That is conferring upon the ICJ the responsibility to decide the meaning of a United States treaty which is United States law. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by centerforartlaw
Phillip Barcio, Why Was Richard Serra’s Tilted Arc So Controversial? [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On the Constitution Unit Blog, Brian Walker assesses the dropped Contempt proceedings against former Northern Ireland secretary Peter Hain. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as  licensing Roberts v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:52 pm by Rick
  (Phillips, supra, at 6, citing Niko v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by INFORRM
  In A v United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights concluded that ‘the broader an [MP’s] immunity, the more compelling must be its justification in order that it can be said to be compatible with the Convention’ ([78]). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Supreme Court ruling in "Quon" highlights importance of employer technology-usage and privacy policiesPrepared by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLPOn June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided City of Ontario v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
The Virginia Non-Compete Blog, whose focus is on the protection of employees, details a recent decision, United Marketing Solutions v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am by Josh Blackman
Hashim Mooppan, Counselor to the Solicitor General, argued on behalf of the United States. [read post]