Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2018, 7:00 am
Phillips appealed the ruling, and the United States Supreme Court ultimately took up the case. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34… [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 4:34 am
Facts: This case (Johnson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
See, e.g., Phillips v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
Phillips responded that the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibit Colorado from enforcing its civil-rights law against him under these circumstances. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
We offered some tentative findings about the linguistic claims made by the majority and dissent in D.C. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:22 am
Claimant Phillip Tucker was hurt on a vessel owned by the United States and being serviced at Cascade General, Inc., the plaintiff’s employer. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
United States and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
United States and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 10:00 pm
However, the BRI standard for AIA trials is different from the standard used in federal district courts and the ITC, which construes patent claims in accordance with the principles that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit articulated in Phillips v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm
The 11th Circuit previously explained in the case of United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 1:56 pm
The FLSA requires all employers in the United States to pay workers engaged in commerce or the production of goods for commerce the prevailing minimum wage. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Madden v. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 12:54 pm
While the current case dealt with homestead for descent and distribution purposes, and Walls dealt with the exemption against forced sale, since both provisions rely on the same constitutional definition of homestead, the court stated that the definitions cannot be different and thus finds its decision to be in conflict with Walls.PEGGY ANN PHILLIPS, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:20 am
Gatti v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (06-1456), on whether the federal money laundering statute requires an attempt to create the appearance of legitimate wealth. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
Phillip J. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:33 pm
Perhaps Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:26 am
When a judicial opinion starts out with a quote such as this, it’s usually not a good sign for the defendant, unless you happen to be the United Auto Workers, the defendant in Phillips v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:44 am
In Phillips v. [read post]
