Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 783
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:33 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
United States and Nelson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) On September 30, Judge Doherty of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana handed down a decision in Vidrine v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:46 am
United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 366 F.3d 1311, 1320, 1322 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 am
SB 1272 (Lieu) would submit the following question to the voters: “Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:38 pm
United States, , 518 F.2d 584, 587 (Ct. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:47 am
In Re:Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy Litigation, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Curcuit, a hearing in the case that alleges that Viacom and Google unlawfully used cookies to track children’s web browsing and video-watching habits on Viacom websites. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:55 pm
The LGBTQ community’s long battle to legalize same-sex marriages finally ended on June 26, 2015 when the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) delivered its opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:55 pm
The LGBTQ community’s long battle to legalize same-sex marriages finally ended on June 26, 2015 when the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) delivered its opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 7:00 am
Phillips appealed the ruling, and the United States Supreme Court ultimately took up the case. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34… [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 11:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 4:34 am
Facts: This case (Johnson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
See, e.g., Phillips v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
Phillips responded that the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibit Colorado from enforcing its civil-rights law against him under these circumstances. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am
Lyle Dennison, reporter for the SCOTUSblog (Supreme Court of the United States Blog), stated in his blog dated June 20th, 2011 that it appears that each woman in the class-action suit in Dukes v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
We offered some tentative findings about the linguistic claims made by the majority and dissent in D.C. v. [read post]
