Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2007, 1:04 pm
Purepac Pharma, Faulding, Watson Pharma, Danbury Pharma, Teva, Zenith Labs, Ivax, Apotex, Torpharm and Eon Labs) United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (06-1572). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
United States, and Florida v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:26 pm
” (track for cert potential) United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:08 am
and eBay unite! [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
Gangi, Susan Nicola, and Phillip J. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:49 pm
Playables (1709 Blog) (IPKat) United States US Patents – Decisions ITC issues final determination finding violation of 19 USC § 1337 and terminates investigation in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) brought by Rambus (ITC Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) District Court Delaware: Source code for future products is discoverable: BigBand Networks Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:40 pm
" United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 8:44 am
Id. at *11; see id. at *10 (citing Phillips v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 8:44 am
Id. at *11; see id. at *10 (citing Phillips v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 8:44 am
Id. at *11; see id. at *10 (citing Phillips v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
United States likely did with the legislative repeal of DADT. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
At the Second Thoughts Blog from the Duke Center for Firearms Law, Daniel Rice examines the court’s “void for vagueness” doctrine and how it might relate to the Second Amendment, drawing on Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:49 pm
” Id. at *10.View #2: Modify CyborThe second approach, favored by some amici curiae including the United States, may be viewed as a fusion or hybrid of de novo review and deferential review. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
November 24, 2021Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state In Matter of Phillip D.S. --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5364714, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
” [via FindLaw] United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
Is this, asks Merpel, the first time an appeal in any IP proceedings in the United Kingdom has been dealt with by a predominantly female tribunal? [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:48 am
As a result, the court relied heavily on an older California Supreme Court case, Miller v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
and the speakers are the all-too-infrequent IP Finance blogger Anne Fairpo (13 Old Square) and Kevin Phillips (no relation to this blogger) of Baker Tilly. [read post]
