Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 801 - 820
of 977
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP) Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46) Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:08 am
and eBay unite! [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:49 pm
From the Court's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 12:14 pm
The defendant’s attorney, Phillip Segrest Jr. of Husch Blackwell Sanders, stated that he was not aware of other Federal Circuit rulings involving advertisements. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 6:54 am
" United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:14 am
Kappos (the case which will decide how business method patents are to be reviewed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office). [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:58 pm
” [33] However, due to the fact that the Tribune Company filed separately from the Chicago Cubs organization, the team should be clear from such action. [34] V. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:42 pm
The New York State Court Appeals heard oral arguments today in Goldstein v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
Many states have responded to this growing concern by enacting legislation restricting the association’s power to foreclose on property. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
In that case, (known as Philips v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 8:14 am
Then, the United States Supreme Court ruled in 2007 in Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Francis v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:10 pm
V. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]