Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Jan 26 2023), a Colorado state appellate court held that Masterpiece Cakeshop and its co-owner Jack Phillips violated the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act when they refused a transgender woman’s order for a pink cake with blue frosting which she wanted to celebrate her birthday and her gender transition. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:15 am
Sys. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Techdirt), A day in the life of an IP blog – WIPO magazine article about the blogging life of Jeremy Phillips: (Patent Baristas) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Droste effect packaging: (box vox), (Class 46), Against cyberproperty (and cybertrespass): (The Trademark Blog), Fabergé egg flip – Article on Fabergé brand and protection strategy: (Afro-IP), Domain name tasting proposal passed by… [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
Phillips, Attorney General; Robin Sessions Cooley, Deputy Attorney General; Douglas J. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v Daily… [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
On Friday 29 April 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 10:53 am
United States, Pam Karlan in Lozman v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP) Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46) Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks… [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
" United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
He stated that it wasn't bad as he had expected, given the war-time circumstances: "We have 75 students, and we haven't had to admit any women. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
In English law the “conventional figures” are much higher than in, say, France but much lower than in the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
Webb v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
Phillips Petroleum Company v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:04 pm
House Bill 3073, if it becomes law, will overturn Michael v. [read post]
