Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 1,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34… [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:46 pm by Guest Author
Additionally, as I argued in my book, American Fair Trade, the corollary to Brandeis’s antimonopolism was the devolution of economic power to smaller business units. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:33 am by Eric Segall
Phillips responded that the free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibit Colorado from enforcing its civil-rights law against him under these circumstances. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am by Charlotte Law Library
Lyle Dennison, reporter for the SCOTUSblog (Supreme Court of the United States Blog), stated in his blog dated June 20th, 2011 that it appears that each woman in the class-action suit in Dukes v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:35 am by Josh Blackman
We offered some tentative findings about the linguistic claims made by the majority and dissent in D.C. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 12:54 pm
While the current case dealt with homestead for descent and distribution purposes, and Walls dealt with the exemption against forced sale, since both provisions rely on the same constitutional definition of homestead, the court stated that the definitions cannot be different and thus finds its decision to be in conflict with Walls.PEGGY ANN PHILLIPS, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (06-1456), on whether the federal money laundering statute requires an attempt to create the appearance of legitimate wealth. [read post]
9 May 2018, 10:00 pm
However, the BRI standard for AIA trials is different from the standard used in federal district courts and the ITC, which construes patent claims in accordance with the principles that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit articulated in Phillips v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:27 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Hagen, 44 U.S. 212, 230 (1845), holds that when a new state is admitted to the Union it gains “the same rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction in that behalf as the original states possess within their respective borders,” Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]