Search for: "Pickering v. Board of Education"
Results 21 - 40
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 3:52 am
Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983), and Pickering v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
Detroit Board of Education. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:17 am
Supreme Court in Pickering v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:10 pm
The Court of Appeals observed that the familiar balancing test derived from Pickering v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Further, said the court, "the arbitration of this grievance would offend public policy" as might otherwise be required by a collective bargaining agreement" would significantly lessen the efficacy of the Hatch Act and frustrate its purpose and scope, citing Matter of Board of Education [Ramapo] 41 NY2d 527. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Further, said the court, "the arbitration of this grievance would offend public policy" as might otherwise be required by a collective bargaining agreement" would significantly lessen the efficacy of the Hatch Act and frustrate its purpose and scope, citing Matter of Board of Education [Ramapo] 41 NY2d 527. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:08 am
Pereira, a social worker, was terminated after making remarks that she, herself, described as a stupid, racist, and unthinking joke.While citing a line of cases that included Pickering v Board of Education, 31 U.S. 563, and Connick v Meyers, 461 U.S. 138, 1983, the Massachusetts high court said that although a public employee’s speech may be entitled to constitutional protection if the employee speaks out on a matter of public concern, and his or… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:24 am
Pickering v Board of Education, 391 US 563, sets out the tests applied by the courts in such cases. . [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm
Board of Education. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 6:58 am
Board of Education Supreme Court's 1983 decision in Connick v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:11 pm
Bd. of Educ. of Twp. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm
Bd. of Educ. (1968), because "where the Branti exception applies the employee can be fired for purely political reasons without any Pickering balancing. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:57 am
Board of Education, which overruled the separate-but-equal doctrine of Plessy v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
Board of Education that public employers can discipline subordinates who speak out on matters of public concern if the speech in some way disrupted workplace or governmental efficiency. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968). [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 12:05 pm
” In addition, under the prior Supreme Court case Pickering v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:16 am
In such a type of case, said the court, "[t]he problem ... is to arrive at a balance between the interests of the [employee] as a citizen, in commenting upon matters of public concern and the interest of the State, as an employer, in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees," quoting from Pickering v Board of Education, 391 US 563. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 12:11 pm
Board of Education (1968). [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:09 am
Rubinstein*NYPPL Comments: Essentially the "Pickering Balancing Test" [Pickering v Board of Education, 391 US 563] requires the court's consideration of the following:1. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 9:35 pm
Board of Education did it clearly establish that the First Amendment protected government employees. [read post]
