Search for: "Pickett v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
  There is a lot in Pickett that merits highlighting, but this paragraph may be my favorite and the most important aspect of the decision (and not just for crack cases, but for all cases):While Booker and § 3553(a) instruct sentencing courts to consider all these "multiple and vague" factors, United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:14 am by Susan Brenner
Instead, he challenged the admission of certain testimony: At trial, Special Agent Michael Pickett of the United States Secret Service testified about a computer forensics examination he had conducted on the seized laptop. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm by Donald Thompson
 While you might argue that a preliminary investigation is not a “matter,” (see, e.g., United States v Pickett, 353 F3d 62 [D.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 1:52 pm by Steve Statsinger
United States, 2010 Wl 2346548 (June 14, 2010). [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
 The Complaint states, however, that Defendant did not design the Outlaw mouthpiece, or any other mouthpieces that were sold by Legends Brass and manufactured by Pickett Brass. [read post]