Search for: "Pierce County v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 328
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2016, 7:15 am
They require the skin to be pierced, and they generate a sample that can be saved and used to gather information other than the suspect’s BAC. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:33 am
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in BIRCHFIELD v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:33 am
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in BIRCHFIELD v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm
Alex Pierce (San Bernardino County, California Superior Court, though this may now be moot since the patient was transferred to a Navy hospital) 2. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
The doctrine dates back at least to Pierce v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
Kazakhstan also commenced an action against the unnamed Does in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking injunctive relief and damages.On March 4, 2015, Kazakhstan initiated this limited action in King County Superior Court. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Merck White Lead Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
And, if indeed the privilege does survive, under what circumstances, if any, may the court pierce through the veil of confidentiality? [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:30 am
And when asked about the venue issue at oral argument, the State responded that, because Nuckolls resides in DeSoto County, the trial judge was within his discretion to find that the transfers took place there.Nuckolls v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 8:56 am
Those cases were later consolidated and tried as one in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
Pierce County, supra. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 5:36 am
Gajda v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Using personal cell phones in the course of conducting “official business”Glenda Nissen v Pierce County, Supreme Court of the State of Washington, Docket #90875~3 In 2010 the Supreme Court of the State of Washington ruled that the State’s Public Records Act (PRA) applied to a record stored on a personal computer. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:09 am
Pierce County, August 27, 2015, Yu, M.). [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 1:44 pm
(The Supreme Court said, in D.C. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
JESUSA ACOSTA, ET AL.; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00110-CV, 406 SW3d 711, 06-26-13) 13-0577 THE FREDERICKSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
” County of Maricopa v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:00 am
Over at The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh reported on the Second Circuit’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
