Search for: "Pierce County v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2016, 8:37 am by Andrew Hamm
During his stint at the Department of Justice, Sanford also participated in the only criminal trial ever held by the Supreme Court: United States v. [read post]
They require the skin to be pierced, and they generate a sample that can be saved and used to gather information other than the suspect’s BAC. [read post]
They require the skin to be pierced, and they generate a sample that can be saved and used to gather information other than the suspect’s BAC. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
 Alex Pierce (San Bernardino County, California Superior Court, though this may now be moot since the patient was transferred  to a Navy hospital) 2. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
 Kazakhstan also commenced an action against the unnamed Does in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking injunctive relief and damages.On March 4, 2015, Kazakhstan initiated this limited action in King County Superior Court. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
And, if indeed the privilege does survive, under what circumstances, if any, may the court pierce through the veil of confidentiality? [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:30 am
And when asked about the venue issue at oral argument, the State responded that, because Nuckolls resides in DeSoto County, the trial judge was within his discretion to find that the transfers took place there.Nuckolls v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 8:56 am by Allred & Allred
Those cases were later consolidated and tried as one in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Using personal cell phones in the course of conducting “official business”Glenda Nissen v Pierce County, Supreme Court of the State of Washington, Docket #90875~3 In 2010 the Supreme Court of the State of Washington ruled that the State’s Public Records Act (PRA) applied to a record stored on a personal computer. [read post]