Search for: "Pitts v. District of Columbia" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
LLC),[5] and the other in the District of Columbia Circuit (see Judge Rogers in Doe v Exxon).[6] Both of these opinions support corporate liability under the ATS and likewise reflect the reasoning of Murray, Kinley and Pitts that the rumours of the death of corporate liability under the ATS are greatly exaggerated. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the appeals court concluded that because the conduct complained of occurred before it issued its decision in Pitt v District of Columbia, clearly establishing malicious prosecution as a violation of constitutional rights, qualified immunity was appropriate here. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm by Law Lady
CLASS ACTION CHALLENGES REDUCTION OF MEDICAID HOME-CARE SERVICES, Pitts v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Facial Recognition and the Fourth Amendment, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, University of the District of Columbia – David A. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
Thereafter, he studied and taught at Columbia University Law School while earning an LL.M. degree. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:38 am by Terry Hart
On January 19, 2011, members of New York City’s theater community and human rights supporters gathered to mark the one month anniversary of Belarus’ contested presidential election. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
Gordon from Columbia Law School – to address our core allegations and concerns. ? [read post]