Search for: "Pitts v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 9:50 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Iowa Rule of Evidence 5.803(3) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement of the declarant’s then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental... [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
A three-judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals unanimously struck down a state voter ID law previously upheld by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:16 pm
 Upon release, Pitts was required by state law to register as a sex offender and did so until October of 1998. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:39 pm by Greg Mersol
  We wrote about the lower court’s decision in Symczyk on September 8, 2011 [link], as well as a similar case decided by the Ninth Circuit at roughly the same time, Pitts v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 12:57 pm
Last week, the online travel companies scored a big win when the Fourth Circuit affirmed the grant of a Motion to Dismiss in a case brought by Pitt County, in Pitt County v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:36 am by Larry Catá Backer
States developed systems of relations with other states, and the resulting rules defined a community of states and the international system. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:17 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
The other three circuits (Second, Third, and Fifth) have similarly held that a defendant cannot “pick off” lead plaintiffs with an offer of judgment in order to avoid a class action.In Pitts v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:45 am
In the case of Loving v Virginia in 1967, an interracial couple were sentenced to one year in prison for marrying each other in Virginia. [read post]